If you build a sauna these days, you are concerned to minimize the energy it consumes. A sauna (Figure 22.1) like a kiln, has insulated walls to minimize the heat lost by conduction during the heating cycle. But if the heat capacity of the walls is high, a great deal of energy is lost simply in heating it up. So choosing the best material for a sauna wall requires a compromise between thermal conductivity λ and specific heat Cp. And it must also be cheap. Table 22.1 itemizes the design requirements.
FUNCTION |
Thermal insulation for sauna walls |
OBJECTIVE |
Minimize energy consumed in use cycle |
CONSTRAINTS |
Maximum operating temperature = 90°C |
Low capital cost of insulation. |
Table 22.1 The design requirements
Case Study Kiln Walls analyzes the material requirements for thermal insulation chosen to minimize the total energy consumed during a heating cycle. The analysis for the sauna is the same as that for the kiln: we seek materials with high values of
, | (M22.1) |
where λ is the thermal conductivity, (W/m.K), Cp the specific heat (J/kg.K), ρ the density (kg/m3) and a the thermal diffusivity (m2/s). The right thickness of a material with a large value of M1 (Figure 22.2) minimizes the sum of the conduction losses and the energy used to heat the sauna walls themselves (which is lost when the sauna is switched off). The appropriate thickness, w, is given (Case Study Kiln Walls) by
, | (M22.2) |
where t is the time for which the sauna is at its operating temperature (assumed to be long compared with the heat-up time). As with the kiln, we may wish to impose an upper limit on w for reasons of space. This implies an upper limit on diffusivity, a :
. | (M22.3) |
There is a second objective: than of minimizing material cost. The cost of the insulation is
(M22.4) |
per unit area of sauna wall. Substituting for w from equation (M22.2) gives
(M22.5) |
The cost is minimized by maximizing
. | (M22.6) |
The neatest way to approach this problem, as with the Kiln of Case Study Kiln Walls, is by a two-stage selection, starting with a chart of the thermal diffusivity (a compound-property)
plotted against thermal conductivity, λ, as in Figure 22.2. Contours of M1 are lines of slope 2. One has been positioned at M1 = 10-3 (m2K/W.s1/2). To this can be added lines of constant wall thickness using equation (M22.2); those shown assume a cycle time of 2 hours. Materials with high values of M1 which also lie below the appropriate thickness contour minimize the total energy lost during the cycle.
The second chart (Figure 22.3) allows selection to minimize cost, again allowing a constraint on wall thickness to be applied. The selection line for M2 has slope -2. Materials which satisfy the conditions shown in the two charts are listed in Table 22.2.
Traditionally, saunas were made of solid wood, many inches thick, built, often, like a log cabin. A wood-finished interior is part of the sauna culture, but (as the table shows) solid wood is not the best choice; its heat capacity is too high and its thermal conductivity — though low — is not as low as that of polymer foams or fiberglass. An energy-efficient sauna has an interior panelled in wood which is as thin as possible, consistent with sufficient mechanical strength; the real insulation, usually polymer foam or fiberglass, is invisible.
MATERIAL |
M1 = a1/2/λ |
COMMENT |
Solid Elastomers |
10-3 – 3 x 10-3 |
Good values of performance index. Useful if the wall must be very thin. |
Solid Polymers |
10-3 – 3 x 10-3 |
Limited to temperatures below 200°C. |
Polymer Foam |
3 x 10-3 – 3 x 10-2 |
The highest value of M1 — hence their use in house insulation. But limited to temperatures below 150°C |
Woods |
3 x 10-4 – 3 x 10-3 |
The boiler of Stevenson's 'Rocket' was insulated with wood. |
Table 22.2 Materials for energy-efficient sauna walls
Holman, JP (1981) 'Heat Transfer', 5th Edition, McGraw-Hill, NY USA.